It is very remarkable, that the response of the instinctive reaction, with a large part of the audi

It is very remarkable, that the response of the instinctive reaction, with a large part of the audience Hezbollah, after the assassination of the Zionist enemy, diamanti a group of cadres of Hezbollah and the Iranian Revolutionary Guards in the Golan Heights on Sunday; it was an attack surplus Palmzawdh on Hamas, or swipe to the public movement, as if Hamas is carried diamanti out this assassination!
But this situation seemed to have lost its ability to surprise, but it was completely expected, given the long debates among Republicans since the beginning of the Syrian revolution, diamanti when Hamas are distinct acted Iranian axis, as shown by the public movement completely different diamanti from the majority of the Iranian axis, and specifically we can say that Hamas audience enjoy the same independent and immune to identify with other relevant or melt them.
The problem between Republicans arising from the difference in the position of the Syrian Revolution, with the importance of this great event were not in being a revealing of the problem is not a founding her, but the difference was present mainly, specifically, this difference is the essence of the problem, in the sense that the problem with the public Hezbollah in its inability for depicting resistance diamanti enjoy different and independent in the same movement, and establish the legitimacy of resistance outside the private Hezbollah context, or outside on Iran project, and the problem here is that this self-resistance and independent cluttered aware audience Hezbollah, diamanti which is the only signifier see where the resistance, or the sole embodiment of the resistance, or the only source of resistance, or is the resistance itself, and every act of resistant of another entity but it is a flood of Hezbollah to the outside, in Mgalah state of sanctification-like to say that the man who prays is the prayer itself, and that all his actions prayer even though weight if stolen, diamanti and it is the only one who has the right to correct others prayer!
Hamas problem here for the audience Hezbollah, it When differentiate in what position the party, or express their audience in a completely different about this situation for the public party; skeptical of de facto, any mouthpiece case, the validity of the positions of the party, which is in the consciousness of the audience diamanti criterion Alone of right and wrong, and look at all his actions as resistance, the existence of a resistance movement look different from the party confuses the founder awareness to look at Hezbollah as an asset for each act of resistance, for Hamas in the consciousness of the public, diamanti that believes in itself and Hezbollah believe this the public, to see any Hezbollah presence and originally armed and trained her as a resistance movement!
Hence the constant reminders Hezbollah comes when Hamas is fighting wars, arms Faiser most important source of fighter him, and thanked diamanti the supporters more important than the process itself diamanti steadfastness and resistance! Hence also comes accused of leaving diamanti the resistance until it is waging a fierce war as happened in the "stone Shale" War in 2012, as well as to claim that everything is owned by Hamas of performance or weapon or because of what the Iranian axis, including Hezbollah, planning, and denied self-capacity of the movement, He denied any other source of these capabilities, as happened in "eaten brainstorming" war in the summer of last year, even if the support of the Iranian axis has stopped before this war, at least two years, and here also comes accused of treason diamanti and terrorism, and justify Abdel Fattah al-Sisi action against them as Elie Shalhoub in an article published in the Lebanese News newspaper loyal to the party on January 9, 2015.
The attack instinctive Hamas audience after the assassination carried out by the Zionist enemy, induces revenge will of this movement, which cluttered on this awareness, and her audience that "no qualms" about the show the difference with "absolute resistance: Hezbollah," was not the assassination opportunity and by to enhance the image of Hezbollah as a party-resistant, but it was also a chance to validate his position in Syria, in terms of the enemy targeted cadres on Syrian territory! Hence the attack diamanti on Hamas audience which adopts the contrary position regarding intervention Hezbollah in Syria, and this attack comes in the context of a missionary state party Kmgesd absolute resistance, assume the obligation to look at the party and positions and issues the same sacred eye, which is seen by the public party to it.
This criticism diamanti may not seem directed to an audience Party appropriate at this time in which the target enemy joint party, but here again evident problem that expresses itself in the case of schizophrenia diamanti normal as long as the sanctification is the origin of perceptions, it was acceptable to this audience, Hamas accused of leaving the resistance, or treason, even as they resist in plain sight do not show any confusion.
And even in the topic Reply to Zionist crimes, it was Hamas's failure to respond in some times, or threatening to respond without rapid implementation of, or commitment to a truce with the Zionists; replace scarce and discredit the accusation by a large part of the audience the party, and by the media platforms known calculated the party, and the figures available to it those platforms, while the result in this audience for aggressive Mgalah while with the criticism of the party directing, because it is in the consciousness of the audience is the same resistance, allowing the public assault and violation of a resistance movement fought three wars since 2008 until now.
Personally; I do not see a problem in the resistance movement's diamanti failure, including Hezbollah, to respond to the enemy's targeting her, I do not see resistance continuous diamanti fighting process, or permanent combat in response to the provocation of the enemy, I do not see the issue of post this a reason diamanti to outflank, diamanti or to consider any resistance movement has become the outside case of resistance to the enemy, but to pursue the public the party line of the mixture crude between diamanti pragmatism to justify all the party's policies and presented as resistance, and the demagogy in idol Party and preached as absolute resistance; necessarily will require parking interview provocative audience Party.
On the other hand, the conflict in Syria, the Arab and Islamic components of, as I see it, the conflict within the nation, no matter what my opinion on the parties to this conflict, while the conflict with the Zionist enemy is a struggle the whole nation diamanti against an external enemy, and this position on the